Ruth Mayer

Bio

Ruth Mayer holds the chair of American Studies at Leibniz University in Hannover, Germany. She is the director of the research project "Multiplication: Modernity, Mass Culture, Gender in the United States, 1910-1933," and the co-editor of Modernity and the Periodical Press: Trans-Atlantic Mass Culture and the Avantgardes, 1880-1920 (Brill, forthcoming 2022).

Contributions

Peer Reviewed
Print Plus Exclusive
Lower-middle-class and working-class girls coming to the big city in the early twentieth century made all sorts of life choices, but in the popular fiction of the period a disproportionate number of them end up as chorus girls. Chorines turned into icons of American urban modernity—versatile, daring, sexy, and young. My article will approach this phenomenon by way of Owen Johnson’s chorus girl novel The Salamander, which appeared monthly in McClure’s Magazine from September 1913 to June 1914 before it came out as a book shortly thereafter. Though now forgotten, the novel was a huge success at the time of its first appearance and led to a veritable salamander craze in the early 1910s. The narrative around a chorus girl and her friends anticipated the idea of the flapper, forging the image of a particular type of young urban woman—walking through the fire of modern urban corruption unscathed, like the legendary animal. For a while, the salamander was everywhere, and while the term disappeared, the phenomenon did not. The salamander just morphed into slightly different forms. A little later, the same type came to be known as a gold digger (following Avery Hopwood’s eponymous play of 1919), then as a flapper (utilizing a term already introduced in Johnson’s novel, to which Zelda Fitzgerald, as the incarnation of flapperdom, pointed as an inspiration). Johnson’s story was picked up and parodied in the society magazines of the day, it inspired a fashion line, was turned into a Broadway play in 1914, and came out as a film in 1916 (dir. Arthur Donaldson, starring Ruth Findlay, now lost).
Peer Reviewed
From the Print Journal
When Fantômas, the futuristic master criminal and terrorist, first enters the stage of modern mass culture in 1911, he complies with the associations raised by his name and does not really take shape. Phantomlike, he gives evidence of his existence through his actions rather than personal appearances. Like other famous creatures appearing on the mass cultural scene of the day—Dracula comes to mind—Fantômas proceeds through dispersal, diffusion, and distraction, figuring forth a flickering presence, not yet here and already gone. In keeping with this logic, the first Fantômas novel famously opens with a dialogue between unidentified speakers, a conversation that seems to float in space: