Aimee Armande Wilson is an Assistant Professor of Humanities at the University of Kansas, author of Conceived in Modernism: The Aesthetics and Politics of Birth Control, and guest editor of the "Harassment" issue of American Book Review. She specializes in topics related to reproduction in interwar literature; her most recent essay, which appeared in Feminist Modernist Studies, argues that Ezra Pound is not the “midwife” of The Waste Land.
Aimee Armande Wilson
Contributions
We Need a Movement, Not Just a Moment: Modernism and #MeToo
“What should we do with the art of terrible men?” asks Emily Nussbaum in I Like to Watch.[1] Reading this book reignited my anger over #MeToo. Nussbaum asks a question that was inescapable in the fall of 2017. The question is difficult, in part because it frames a complex set of issues as resolvable with a single answer. To get an intellectual handle on the question, I had to lay out the nesting-doll questions hidden inside the big one. Two of them are the focus of my essay: what is the role of literary criticism in the era of #MeToo? Do modernist critics have distinctive responsibilities or knowledge pertaining to #MeToo? My answers to these questions emphasize praxis: what those of us working in the field of modernist literary studies can do to ensure the lessons of #MeToo aren’t forgotten. Modernist scholars assume many roles, of course. The essays in the cluster “Reading The Waste Land with the #MeToo Generation” address the implications of #MeToo for modernist pedagogy. This essay complements the cluster by directing our attention to a different (though sometimes overlapping) role, that of the literary critic. I outline in practical terms some of the implications of #MeToo for modernist criticism in the hopes that such concrete thinking will spur conversation about ways to embed the lessons of #MeToo in our critical practices.